🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to erase Black history and experience from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how little it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.